Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Cloud Native Now

MENUMENU

Home
Webinars
Podcasts
About
Sponsor

MENUMENU

News
- Latest News
- News Releases
Cloud-Native Development
Cloud-Native Platforms
Cloud-Native Networking
Cloud-Native Security

OCI artifacts

SRE, autoscaling, Tailscale, Kubernetes, argo cd, Kubernetes v1.33, AI, Nelm, Kubernetes, architecture, , architecture, Rackspace, GPUs, Kubernetes, Solo.io Kubernetes cloud foundry keptn cloud-native automation

What to Expect From Kubernetes 1.36

Kubernetes 1.36 launches April 22, 2026, marking a major shift in networking as Ingress-Nginx retires in favor of the more scalable Gateway API. Key updates include bolstered Linux User Namespaces for better ...

Adrian Bridgwater | March 13, 2026 | admission control config, CloudNativeCon, cluster security, container isolation, Deployment Stability, DRA, Dynamic Resource Allocation, EKS, fat image anti-pattern, gateway API, ingress-nginx retirement, Karpenter, KubeCon Europe, Kubernetes 1.36, Linux user namespaces, LLM weights, manifest-based admission control, OCI artifacts, platform engineering, security patches, specialized hardware, taints and tolerations, upgrade risk, VolumeSource, WatchCache

TLS, certificates, Docker, vulnerabilities, supply chain, KubeCon, SigStore, Kubernetes TrapX container security

The Missing Control Plane in Cloud-Native Supply Chains

Explore how an artifact access plane can improve Kubernetes platform performance, scalability, and security by standardizing how artifacts are governed and delivered, aligning with CNCF ecosystem initiatives ...

Adrian Herrera | March 4, 2026 | artifact access plane, artifact decentralization, artifact firewall, artifact flow optimization, artifact governance, cloud infrastructure, cloud-native platforms, CNCF ecosystem, developer velocity, devops, GitOps, kubernetes, OCI artifacts, platform resilience., software supply chain, Virtual Registry

Techstrong TV

Click full-screen to enable volume control

Watch latest episodes and shows

Tech Field Day Events

UPCOMING WEBINARS

CloudNativeNow.com
DevOps.com
SecurityBoulevard.com

From Experimentation to Production: Why Inference Is the Defining Layer of AI

4 June 2026

From Experimentation to Production: Why Inference Is the Defining Layer of AI

Beyond Embedded! RISC-V in the Performance CPU segment

27 May 2026

AI in DevOps: Vendor Promise vs. Enterprise Reality

21 May 2026

AI in DevOps: Vendor Promise vs. Enterprise Reality

AI in DevOps: An Enterprise Reality Check

21 May 2026

AI in DevOps: An Enterprise Reality Check

35 Million Lines, Zero Build-Breakers: How Adyen Scaled DevSecOps

23 June 2026

35 Million Lines, Zero Build-Breakers: How Adyen Scaled DevSecOps

How to Conduct AI-Native Bug Discovery & Triage

18 June 2026

How to Conduct AI-Native Bug Discovery & Triage

Toxic Flows: When Your Agent Skill Becomes a Supply Chain Attack

18 June 2026

Toxic Flows: When Your Agent Skill Becomes a Supply Chain Attack

Podcast

Listen to all of our podcasts

Press Releases

ThreatHunter.ai Halts Hundreds of Attacks in the past 48 hours: Combating Ransomware and Nation-State Cyber Threats Head-On

ThreatHunter.ai Halts Hundreds of Attacks in the past 48 hours: Combating Ransomware and Nation-State Cyber Threats Head-On

Deloitte Partners with Memcyco to Combat ATO and Other Online Attacks with Real-Time Digital Impersonation Protection Solutions

Deloitte Partners with Memcyco to Combat ATO and Other Online Attacks with Real-Time Digital Impersonation Protection Solutions

SUBSCRIBE TO CNN NEWSLETTER

MOST READ

Intruder Adds Container Image Scanning to Cloud Security Platform

April 14, 2026

Kubernetes v1.36 Promotes Stability, Compatibility & Reproducibility

April 22, 2026

Report: Utilization of Kubernetes Infrastructure Remains Abysmal

April 21, 2026

AWS Drives Kubernetes Simplification With EKS Hybrid Nodes Gateway

May 4, 2026

Solo.io Extends kagent Runtime to NemoClaw Governance Framework for AI Agents

May 8, 2026

RECENT POSTS

Container/Kubernetes Management Contributed Content Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X

Kubernetes in Production: Where Platform Decisions Break Down

May 11, 2026 Alex Vakulov 0

Contributed Content DevSecOps Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X

Where DevOps Pipelines Break: Real Attack Paths in Cloud-Native CI/CD

May 11, 2026 Alex Vakulov 0

Containers Contributed Content Docker Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Topics

Java Code Isn’t the Problem – The Container Is

May 11, 2026 Swapneswar Sundar Ray 0

Container/Kubernetes Management Features Kubernetes Governance Kubernetes in the Enterprise Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X

Solo.io Extends kagent Runtime to NemoClaw Governance Framework for AI Agents

May 8, 2026 Mike Vizard 0

Cloud-Native Data Protection Container/Kubernetes Management Features Kubernetes Kubernetes in the Enterprise Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Virtualization

Trilio Extends Disaster Recovery Reach to Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization

May 7, 2026 Mike Vizard 0

About
Media Kit
Sponsor Info
Write for Cloud Native Now
Copyright
TOS
Privacy Policy

Powered by Techstrong Group

Copyright © 2026 Techstrong Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Executive Security Survey

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

In the past 12 months, has your team been involved in detecting, investigating, or remediating a cybersecurity incident that originated from a senior leader's (or senior leader's family member's) personal device, home network, or personal online account?*
- Yes, multiple times
- Yes, at least once
- No, but we have formal responsibility to do so
- No, this is not part of our team's scope

When a security incident targeting a senior leader or senior leader's family member originates outside the physical and digital corporate perimeter, how does your team typically become aware of it? (Select one)*
- The executive or a family member reports it directly
- Our corporate security tools detect anomalous activity that we trace back to a personal source
- A third-party service or vendor alerts us
- We discover it during routine threat intelligence monitoring
- We usually don't find out until there is a downstream corporate impact
- Other

What are the most common threat vectors your team has encountered in incidents targeting senior leaders or their families outside the corporate environment? (Select up to three)*
- Phishing or smishing (email/SMS) to personal accounts
- Credential harvesting or account takeover of personal accounts
- AI-generated impersonation or deepfake targeting the executive or family members
- Compromise of the executive's home network or personal devices
- Exploitation of personal information exposed in data brokers or dark web leaks
- Social engineering of family members to reach the executive
- Sextortion, catfishing, or reputational extortion

On average, how many total staff hours does your team spend investigating and remediating any one incident that originates from a senior leader's personal digital life? Including any downstream corporate impact in your estimate. (Select one)*
- Fewer than 4 hours
- 4–10 hours
- 11–20 hours
- More than 20 hours
- We have not been able to estimate this

Which of the following challenges has your team experienced when responding to a security incident involving a senior leader's personal digital life? (Select all that apply)*
- Navigating legal or privacy concerns when accessing the executive's personal data
- Lack of visibility in personal devices, accounts, or home networks
- Reluctance or resistance from the executive or their family to cooperate
- No formal incident response playbook covering non-corporate assets
- Pulling senior security staff away from higher-priority corporate security work
- Uncertainty about whether the incident creates corporate regulatory exposure
- Difficulty coordinating with external vendors or service providers

Does your organization's current incident response plan include formal, documented procedures for handling security incidents on assets not owned or managed by the corporation? (Select one)*
- Yes, we have specific documented procedures for non-corporate assets
- We have informal or ad hoc processes, but nothing formally documented
- No, our IR plan only covers corporate-owned assets
- Don't know

What is the most likely way your security operations would change if an external service could handle detection, investigation, and remediation of security incidents targeting senior leaders' personal digital lives—without involving your internal team or requiring access to executives' personal data? (Select one)*
- It would allow our team to increase focus on corporate priorities
- It would help resolve corporate legal and privacy concerns
- It would be helpful but otherwise not meaningfully change our operations
- We would be unlikely to adopt an external service for this purpose

How might such an external service (that doesn't involve your internal team or require access to executives' personal data) change your security operations burden? (Select one)*
- It would significantly reduce the operational burden
- It would moderately reduce the burden
- It would not reduce or increase the burden
- It would moderately increase the burden
- It would significantly increase the burden
- Don't know

Δ